Différences

Ci-dessous, les différences entre deux révisions de la page.

--- hors_les_murs:evenements:tiny_story_grand_history [2021/05/26 09:42] – add information xavcc
+++ hors_les_murs:evenements:tiny_story_grand_history [2021/05/28 13:35] (Version actuelle) – modification externe 127.0.0.1
@@ Ligne 1: / Ligne 1: @@
-====== tiny story, Grand History ======
+====== tiny story, Grand History (ts,GH) ======
 Collective session based on the method of animation "{{:hors_les_murs:evenements:petite_histoire-grande_histoire.pdf|tiny story,Grand History in public (pdf in fr} }} [[wp>en:Popular_education|popular education]] to make visible and share questioning on the representations, the transmission of experiences... **To question and document differently our own practices to make them evolve**.
@@ Ligne 18: / Ligne 18: @@
   * To provide a material to give a new support in addition to the graphic and aesthetic presentation of collected evidence or collected data
   * etc.
+{{ layers-tsgh.png }}
 </note>
-  * **Duration**: 2 to 4 hours in total (sometimes more) with 1 hour per participant⋅e, number: between 5 and 10 people
+  * **Duration**: 2 to 4 hours in total (sometimes more) with 1 individual hour per participant, number: between 5 and 10 people
   * **Layout**: wall mural or blank table or digital board (e.g. https://excalidraw.com)
   * **Desire**: to share our life stories, the roots of our anger and our commitments, to organize the transmission of our political experiences
@@ Ligne 111: / Ligne 113: @@
 Individual and collective listening is a strength in this session that must be taken care of
 </note>
+{{ gh_timeline.png }}
+When a participant posts his or her moment in the big story, that person has a short time to tell and explain why he or she chose that moment, keeping the constraint of the story in a collective perspective. **A collective note of the story is organized (paper, web pad, etc.)**
+Each person speaks in turn without an imposed historical chronology.
+<blockquote>
+**Challenges** :
+To embody, with the help of one's memories, situations and people who have made us grow, who have shaped our path, to measure the convergences between the participants and the specificities of each one; to make the link between different contexts of emancipation and to observe the "availability regimes" of those who have helped us to grow. This exercise will also have the merit of proposing a method that privileges testimonies over arguments, thus creating egalitarian positions in the group; finally, this work will have the interest of encouraging inter-knowledge, including between people who believe they know each other.
+<cite>More information on the method (and a site on which to search (fr)): http://www.scoplepave.org/petite-histoire-grande-histoire</cite>
+</blockquote>
+==== 3rd phase : Sharing in common ====
+    * **Around the tiny stories** ~ 20 to 120min
+With the same method as phase 2, the participants come to display their tiny stories with :
+    * explanation of the choice
+    * associated narrative
+    * collective notes
+{{ gh_timeline-2_1_.png }}
+==== 4th phase: Wrapping round ====
+Speech or non-speech is free and respected, like an offering. The questions are there to open up possibilities.
+At the end of this session, the group is asked to do a round of free speech that answers all or part of the following questions
+    * How do I feel at the end of this workshop?
+    * What needs did this workshop meet?
+    * What did I learn about myself, about the group, from this workshop?
+    * How does the Grand History nourish our individual experiences?
+    * And our tiny stories?
+    * What do they tell about us?
+    * Do I have stories I want to share beyond this circle?
+<note>
+Take note !
+</note>